PHP - Downgrade A Composer Dependency Package
I just updated a site as follows: cd /var/www/concrete5 composer update Among other changes, the following were made (more on this later): - Updating concrete5/core (8.5.2 => 8.5.4): Downloading (100%) - Updating doctrine/collections (1.6.4 => 1.6.5): Downloading (100%) - Updating doctrine/lexer (1.2.0 => 1.2.1): Downloading (100%) - Updating doctrine/inflector (1.3.1 => 1.4.3): Downloading (100%) - Updating doctrine/cache (1.10.0 => 1.10.1): Downloading (100%) - Updating doctrine/annotations (1.10.2 => 1.10.3): Downloading (100%) - Updating doctrine/common (2.12.0 => 2.13.3): Downloading (100%) - Updating doctrine/instantiator (1.3.0 => 1.3.1): Downloading (100%) - Updating doctrine/orm (v2.7.2 => v2.7.3): Downloading (100%)
errno: 150 "Foreign key constraint is incorrectly formed I expected I should have first used concrete5's update script, but too late for that. So, then I changed composer.json require concrete5/core from ^8.5 to 8.5.2 hoping to return to the previous state. Concreete5 was downgraded as desired, but now I get the following error: Class 'Doctrine\Common\Persistence\Mapping\Driver\MappingDriverChain' not found On another concrete5 site which still works, I have the following two files, however, on the broken one I only have the second: vendor/doctrine/persistence/lib/Doctrine/Common/Persistence/Mapping/Driver/MappingDriverChain.php:13: class MappingDriverChain extends \Doctrine\Persistence\Mapping\Driver\MappingDriverChain vendor/doctrine/persistence/lib/Doctrine/Persistence/Mapping/Driver/MappingDriverChain.php:17:class MappingDriverChain implements MappingDriverSo, now I will attempt to downgrade doctrine from 2.7.3 to 2.7.2. The base composer.json file has no reference to Doctrine, but there are two other related composer files: vendor/concrete5/doctrine-xml/composer.json { "name": "concrete5/doctrine-xml", "description": "Define database structure via XML using Doctrine data types", "keywords": [ "doctrine", "xml", "structure", "database", "schema" ], "homepage": "https://github.com/concrete5/doctrine-xml", "license": "MIT", "autoload": { "psr-4": { "DoctrineXml\\": "src/" } }, "require": { "php": ">=5.3" }, "require-dev": { "doctrine/dbal": "2.5.*" } } vendor/concrete5/dependency-patches/composer.json { "type":"library", "license":"MIT", "name":"concrete5/dependency-patches", "description":"Patches required for concrete5 dependencies", "homepage":"https://github.com/concrete5/dependency-patches", "authors":[ { "name":"Michele Locati", "email":"michele@locati.it", "role":"author", "homepage":"https://mlocati.github.io" } ], "require":{ "mlocati/composer-patcher": "^1.0.0" }, "extra":{ "patches": { "doctrine/annotations:1.2.7": { "Fix access array offset on value of type null": "doctrine/annotations/access-array-offset-on-null.patch" }, "doctrine/orm:2.5.14": { "Fix UnitOfWork::createEntity()": "doctrine/orm/UnitOfWork-createEntity-continue.patch" }, "zendframework/zend-stdlib:2.7.7": { "Fix ArrayObject::unserialize()": "zendframework/zend-stdlib/ArrayObject-unserialize-continue.patch" }, "sunra/php-simple-html-dom-parser:1.5.2": { "Fix minus in regular expressions": "sunra/php-simple-html-dom-parser/minus-in-regular-expressions.patch" }, "phpunit/phpunit:4.8.36": { "Avoid each() in Getopt": "phpunit/phpunit/Getopt-each.patch" }, "tedivm/jshrink:1.1.0": { "Fix continue switch in Minifier": "tedivm/jshrink/fix-minifier-loop.patch", "Update to upstream version 1.3.2": "tedivm/jshrink/update-upstream-1.3.2.patch" }, "zendframework/zend-code:2.6.3": { "Fix continue switch in FileGenerator and MethodReflection": "zendframework/zend-code/switch-continue.patch" }, "zendframework/zend-http:2.6.0": { "Remove support for the X-Original-Url and X-Rewrite-Url headers": "zendframework/zend-http/no-x-original-url-x-rewrite.patch" }, "zendframework/zend-mail:2.7.3": { "Fix idn_to_ascii deprecation warning": "zendframework/zend-mail/fix-idn_to_ascii-deprecation-warning.patch" }, "zendframework/zend-validator:2.8.2": { "Fix idn_to_ascii/idn_to_utf8 deprecation warning": "zendframework/zend-validator/fix-idn_to_-deprecation-warning.patch" } } } } Neither seem to be applicable, but the doctrine version has to be specified somewhere. How does composer determine which version and how can I downgrade the dependency package? Thanks
PS. As a hack solution, I replaced the entire vendor/doctrine directory from one from another site, and have things working. Still, want to know how to do this right. Edited June 12, 2020 by NotionCommotionSimilar TutorialsThis topic has been moved to PHP Installation & Configuration. http://www.phpfreaks.com/forums/index.php?topic=355087.0 Okay so I am using PEAR's Validate package to validate a few values in my form, it validates the username just fine, but is for some reason returning false on the password field, even if the credentials are correct. Here is the link to the package (http://pear.php.net/package/Validate/) Here is the code: Code: [Select] <?php require("Validate.php");?> <?php require("styles/top.php");?> <?php $validate = new Validate(); ?> <div id="head_reg"> <div id="head_cen_reg"> <div id="head_sup_reg" class="head_height_reg"> <?php require("scripts/newsfeed.php"); ?> <?php require("scripts/links.php"); ?> </div> </div> </div> <div id="content"> <br /> <?php if(isset($_POST['reg-btn'])){ $username = strip_tags ($_POST['username']); $email = strip_tags($_POST['email']); $password = strip_tags($_POST['pass']); $repassword = strip_tags($_POST['repass']); if ($username && $password && $repassword && $email){ if($validate->string($username,$options = array( 'format' => VALIDATE_ALPHA, 'min_length' => 6, 'max_length' => 50))){ if($validate->string($password,$options = array( 'format' => VALIDATE_ALPHA, 'min_length' => 6, 'max_length' => 32))){ if ($password == $repassword){ if ($validate->email($email,$options = array( 'check_domain' => 'true', 'fullTLDValidation' => 'true', 'use_rfc822' => 'true', 'VALIDATE_GTLD_EMAILS' => 'true', 'VALIDATE_CCTLD_EMAILS' => 'true', 'VALIDATE_ITLD_EMAILS' => 'true', ))){ $query = mysql_query("SELECT * FROM users WHERE username='$username'"); $numrows = mysql_num_rows($query); if ($numrows == 0){ $query = mysql_query("SELECT * FROM users WHERE email='$email'"); $numrows = mysql_num_rows($query); if ($numrows == 0){ $pass = md5(md5($password)); $ip = $_SERVER['REMOTE_ADDR']; $date = date("F, d, Y g:i:s A"); mysql_query("INSERT INTO users VALUES ('', '$username', '$pass', '$email','Member', '$date','','0','$ip', '0')"); echo"<center>Thanks, $username! You have completed the registration process and may now login <a href=\"login.php\"><b>here!</b></center>"; } else echo"<center><font color=\"#FF0000\">That email is already in use!</font></center>"; } else echo"<center><font color=\"#FF0000\">That username is already taken!</font></center>"; } else echo"<center><font color=\"#FF0000\">That email is invalid!</font></center>"; } else echo"<center><font color=\"#FF0000\">Those passwords do not match!</font></center>"; } else echo"<center><font color=\"#FF0000\">Your password must be betweed 6 and 25 characters long!</font></center>"; } else echo"<center><font color=\"#FF0000\">Your username must be between 6 and 50 characters long!</font></center>"; } else echo"<center><font color=\"#FF0000\">You did not fill out the entire form!</font></center>"; } ?> <div id="register_form"> <form action="register.php" method="post" enctype="multipart/form-data"> <center> <table> <tr> <td>Desired Username </td> <td><input type="text" name="username" class="textbox" value="<?php $_POST['username'];?>"/></td> </tr> <tr> <td>E-Mail </td> <td><input type="text" name="email" class="textbox" value="<?php $_POST['email'];?>" /></td> </tr> <tr> <td>Password </td> <td><input type="password" name="pass" class="textbox" /></td> </tr> <tr> <td>Confirm Password </td> <td><input type="password" name="repass" class="textbox" /></td> </tr> <tr> <td><p class="register"> <input name="reg-btn" type="submit" class="btn" value="REGISTER" /> </p></td> </tr> </table> </center> </form> </div> <center><a href="#" id="showreg">Why register? Click here</a></center> <div id="content_cen"> <div id="content_sup"> <div id="welcom_pan"> <h3><span>Why</span> Register?</h3> <p>Class aptent taciti sociosqu ad litora torquent per conubia nostra, per inceptos himenaeos. Nulla vitae diam magna, eget fringilla tellus. Curabitur est velit, suscipit eu faucibus eget, aliquam ac enim. per inceptos himenaeos. Nulla vitae diam magna, eget fringilla tellus.</p> </div> </div> </div> </div> <div id="foot_reg"> <div id="foot_cen_reg"> <ul> </ul> <p></p> </div> </div> </body> </html> Job offer: PHP Developer (Rotterdam) I'm trying to use dependency injection to pass a database connection to an object but I'm not sure why it's not working. I have my "dbClass" below that connects to a MySQL database. Code: [Select] class dbClass { public $db; function __construct() { $this->db = mysql_connect("localhost","username","password") or die ('Could not connect: ' . mysql_error()); return $this->db; } } Then I have my "baseClass". This is the class that I want to feed to connection too. Code: [Select] class baseClass { public $mysql_conn; function __construct($db) { $this->mysql_conn = $db; $rs = mysql_select_db("webdev_db", $this->mysql_conn) or die ('Could not connect: ' . mysql_error()); } } And this is my index.php file. The error I'm getting is "supplied argument is not a valid MySQL-Link resource". However I tripled checked and my db connection details are definately correct. Code: [Select] $db = new dbClass(); $baseclass = new baseClass($db); Thanks for any help. I need to create an entity which models the connection between a PHP server and another device so that a web app can change the entity's properties which in turn will update the server DB as well as the other device. A little background information for context is as follows: When a socket clients connects to the PHP server, it will register by providing its GUID, and in turn the server will query its DB to identify the specific client. The client has various other properties associated with the socket connection such as reconnect_timeout, response_timeout, etc, and the associated values will also be stored in the server's DB. While all socket clients use the same approach to communicate to the PHP server, several "flavors" of socket clients exists which use a specific protocol (Modbus/RTU, Modbus/IP, ControlNet, BACnet/IP, BACnet/MSTP, KNX, DALI) to communicate to downstream devices. Based on the used protocol, there will be different properties as well as different methods (i.e. some protocols allow one to query the device to retrieve a list of available data). To create the entity using inheritance, I would likely do so whe class ModbusRtuSocketClient extends ModbusSocketClient (which extends SocketClient) class ModbusIpSocketClient extends ModbusSocketClient (which extends SocketClient) class ControlNetSocketClient extends SocketClient etc.. But instead of doing so by using inheritance, I am thinking that I should do so through injection. For instance, I create an object called SocketClient which just deals with that scope of work and is protocol agnostic. I also create a second object which deals with a given protocol such as ModbusRtuProtocol extends ModbusProtocol extends Protocol. I then do one of the following: $entity = new SocketClient(new ModbusRtuProtocol()); //or $entity = new ModbusRtuProtocol(new SocketClient()); //and do $entity->setSomeSocketClientProperty(123); $entity->getProperty()->setSomeSpecificProtocolProperty(321); $entity->updateEndDevice(); $entityManager->persist($entity); $entityManager->flush(); //or do $values=$entity->queryDevice();
PS. If you think I shouldn't be doing so through injection but through inheritance, please advise. I am on a shared hosting server running CentOS. I have copied a PHP extension (imagick.so) that was built on similar server to my shared hosting server. I have resolved most of the dependencies by placing the missing files in ~/lib but I have one that I can't figure out how to cope with. I am getting the following error:
Could use some help with dependency injection, as I can't seem to find the answer anywhere. Ok, take a quick PHP class:
<?php namespace myapp; use myapp\template; use myapp\order; class user { private $template; public function __construct(template $template) { $this->template = $template; } public function add_order(order $order) { // do something with $order here } }
I'm using the php-di package from http://php-di.org/ right now, but open to changing. My question is, how do I call that "add_order()" method, and have $order injected into it? Constructor injection is easy, and just use:
$container = new Di\Container(); $container->make(myapp\user);
How do I do that, but calling the add_order() method instead? I want something like:
$container = new Di\Container(); $container->make(myapp\user::add_order);
Any help?
Thanks, Matt
I'm looking for some clarification here from different viewpoints to understand real world applications. In a previous thread, I suggested to someone that they read up on singleton methods to restrict class duplication (oops!), I was quickly (and rightfully) shot down. I did this after having read through blog posts that also suggested singleton design to stop multiple MySQL connections. At the time I didn't consider that could be useful to some people.. fair enough. Thankfully I don't use singleton methods within my own code, but I do use static methods for most things. Reading through numerous blog posts, tutorials, etc.., it seems like static methods can also be considered anti-design and is something to avoid. So now it seems I'm at a point where I need to rewrite my existing framework & CMS, probably using dependency injection within my classes. I understand how this works, and why it makes sense. What I'm struggling with is understanding how to use dependency injection within a (personal) CMS application. For example - I have a config.ini file I have a class that reads the .ini file, stores the variables, and provides me methods to access them I have a content class that selects the relevant page/component from the DB (db & config dependency), then displays it via my template engine. Within the included view files I call component classes (articles, contact, etc..), each of these require a connection to the DB, which has a config dependency. Here's some code to explain it better - index.php <?php $settings = '/config/config.ini'; $config = new Config($settings); $db = new Database($config); $content = new Content( $db ); // Config may also be passed for content config - keeping it simple for example print $content->loadPage($_GET['page']); // This would now include the code below ?>Let's say that this then loads the article index (through $content->loadPage()). The view would look something like this - article_index.php <?php // Duplicated code $settings = '/config/config.ini'; $config = new Config($settings); $db = new Database($config); // Article code $articles = new Articles_Model($db); return $articles->getArticles(0,15); ?>Now my problem is that I'm duplicating the config and db class calls for no reason. Is the sollution to store these within a registry class? But then I'm creating globals, which again seems anti-design. Or is the problem how I load the active page? Any insights would be much appreciated. This topic has been moved to Application Design. http://www.phpfreaks.com/forums/index.php?topic=346818.0 I've only seen composer packages using vendor name and package name namespace. Is it possible to use deeper namespace such as the following? For instance, package: { "name": "notioncommotion/my-sub-namespace/my-package", "description": "MyPackage located in MySubNamespace.", ... } is used in some project: { "require": { "notioncommotion/my-sub-namespace/my-package": "^1.2" } } If not, what do you think were the reasons composer does not allow? Thanks I'm beginning to study Composer and am developing a system where I separate the files core application files, as follows:
/root |-- /src |-- /App |-- /DBConfig |-- /Controller |-- /Model |-- /Core |-- /Helper |-- /Controller |-- /ModelSo, to set this setting in composer.json file and get access to all classes both /App much /Core would be this way? "autoload" : { "psr-X" : { "App\\" : "/src", "Core\\" : "/src" } }Or is there a more correct way? I have also read about PSR-0 vs PSR-4 and I am still somewhat in doubt which one to use. In my case what should I implement, PSR-0 or PSR-4? php74 is installed as my primary php, but I am also working with a different framework that can only use php73 and set up a separate pool to deal with it. Recently, my installed composer1 told me I should upgrade to composer2 and I did so, but then found that the previously mentioned other framework also doesn't work with composer2 but only composer1. When updating a package with composer, sometimes I get composer errors or even worse no composer errors but PHP errors later on where classes don't exist, and I think it relates to using the wrong version of PHP (and maybe even composer). Is it always required to consistently use composer with a single version of PHP? Anything to worry about different versions of composer or will I just get a message. Any other best practices? Any issues how I set up composer below? Thanks! curl -sS https://getcomposer.org/installer | php # or if desired, use resulting composer.phar as: $ php (or php73) composer.phar update/install/etc chmod +x composer.phar sudo mv composer.phar /usr/local/bin/composer sudo ln -s /usr/local/bin/composer /usr/local/bin/composer2 curl -sS https://getcomposer.org/installer | php73 chmod +x composer.phar sudo mv composer.phar /usr/local/bin/composer2_73 php -r "copy('https://getcomposer.org/installer', 'composer-setup.php');" php -r "if (hash_file('sha384', 'composer-setup.php') === '756890a4488ce9024fc62c56153228907f1545c228516cbf63f885e036d37e9a59d27d63f46af1d4d07ee0f76181c7d3') { echo 'Installer verified'; } else { echo 'Installer corrupt'; unlink('composer-setup.php'); } echo PHP_EOL;" php composer-setup.php --version=1.10.19 chmod +x composer.phar sudo mv composer.phar /usr/local/bin/composer1 php73 composer-setup.php --version=1.10.19 chmod +x composer.phar sudo mv composer.phar /usr/local/bin/composer1_73 rm composer-setup.php
Was just wondering why some people choose NOT to make use of static functions when initializing objects via Factory Classes/Containers. What are the benefits of initializing the Factory class when for all intensive purposes, it's only used to initialize new classes, etc? Does this have any impact on Dependency Injection? I'm assuming that it doesn't since that would defeat the purpose. --------- Also, I've noticed that there seems to be an intense stigma within the development community in regard to singletons. Are singletons necessarily a bad thing? What about database objects? One argument I've heard is that this can often impact the flexibility of your application in the event that a new instance of said class needs to be initialized(a second completely separate connection). However, I was thinking that you could simply store these objects within a static member variable in the factory class; leaving the Database Class' __construct public in the event that you need to create that second/third/fourth connection. Wouldn't this resolve the issue? I think I am close, but not sure if I am quite there. Am I doing this correctly? I have several entity classes which will use class type inheritance:
MyNamespace\MyApp\Vehicle\Vehicle #MyNamespace.MyApp.Vehicle.Vehicle.dcm.yml MyNamespace\MyApp\Vehicle\Vehicle: type: entity table: vehicle_table inheritanceType: JOINED discriminatorColumn: name: discriminator_column type: string discriminatorMap: vehicle: Vehicle groundVehicle: MyNamespace\MyApp\Vehicle\GroundVehicle\GroundVehicle airVehicle: MyNamespace\MyApp\Vehicle\AirVehicle\AirVehicle repositoryClass: Vehicle id: id: type: integer generator: strategy: AUTO fields: grandParentItem1: type: string grandParentItem2: type: string #MyNamespace.MyApp.Vehicle.AirVehicle.AirVehicle.dcm.yml MyNamespace\MyApp\Vehicle\AirVehicle\AirVehicle: type: entity table: air_vehicle extends: MyNamespace\MyApp\Vehicle\Vehicle inheritanceType: JOINED discriminatorMap: airVehicle: AirVehicle airplane: MyNamespace\MyApp\Vehicle\AirVehicle\Airplane\Airplane rocket: MyNamespace\MyApp\Vehicle\AirVehicle\Rocket\Rocket repositoryClass: AirVehicle id: id: associationKey: true fields: parentItem1: type: string parentItem2: type: string #MyNamespace.MyApp.Vehicle.AirVehicle.Rocket.Rocket.dcm.yml MyNamespace\MyApp\Vehicle\AirVehicle\Rocket\Rocket: extends: MyNamespace\MyApp\Vehicle\AirVehicle\AirVehicle type: entity table: rocket_table id: id: associationKey: true repositoryClass: Rocket fields: childItem1: type: string childItem2: type: string I haven't shown GroundVehicle or Train, Car, and Airplane, but they are almost identical to AirVehicle and Rocket, respectively.
I've discovered that the barebone entities need to be manually created prior to using orm:generate-entities else I get class not found errors, and have created them as shown below. [michael@devserver doctrine]$ find inheritance_src -name "*.php" -exec cat {} \; <?php namespace MyNamespace\MyApp\Vehicle\AirVehicle\Airplane; class Airplane extends \MyNamespace\MyApp\Vehicle\AirVehicle\AirVehicle{} <?php namespace MyNamespace\MyApp\Vehicle\AirVehicle\Rocket; class Rocket extends \MyNamespace\MyApp\Vehicle\AirVehicle\AirVehicle{} <?php namespace MyNamespace\MyApp\Vehicle\AirVehicle; abstract class AirVehicle extends \MyNamespace\MyApp\Vehicle\Vehicle{} <?php namespace MyNamespace\MyApp\Vehicle\GroundVehicle\Car; class Car extends \MyNamespace\MyApp\Vehicle\GroundVehicle\GroundVehicle{} <?php namespace MyNamespace\MyApp\Vehicle\GroundVehicle\Train; class Train extends \MyNamespace\MyApp\Vehicle\GroundVehicle\GroundVehicle{} <?php namespace MyNamespace\MyApp\Vehicle\GroundVehicle; abstract class GroundVehicle extends \MyNamespace\MyApp\Vehicle\Vehicle{} <?php namespace MyNamespace\MyApp\Vehicle; abstract class Vehicle{} I then am able to successfully create the entities using orm:generate-entities, schema using orm:schema-tool:create, and repositories using orm:generate-repositories. Does everything seem correct? A couple of issues which I have my doubts: Locating the classes in inheritance_src/MyNamespace/MyApp instead of inheritance_src/MyApp. I tried to do the later and modify my psr-4 autoloader to use "MyNamespace\\": "inheritance_src/", but could not get it working without first creating the entities, editing them to add the "abstract" and "extend" portions, and then moving them to one directory lower. Needing to manually create the barebone classes in the first place. My meta-data definitions includes "extends: MyNamespace\MyApp\Vehicle\Vehicle", so I would thought it would not be necessary. Locate both the entities and repositories in the same folder. For that matter, I will probably be locating my service in the same folder as well. It seems that most frameworks will locate all the entities in one folder (with of course subdirectories), repositories in another, services in another, etc. The way I am doing seems to be organized domain modules as described by https://mnapoli.fr/organizing-code-into-domain-modules/. Any compelling reasons to do it one way or the other?
Thank you Hi.
My sys admin guy has informed me that installing composer is unlikely. They're a bit jumpy about security around here.
I tried to download and run Laravel on it's own but I'm getting errors when I go to http://example.com/t...laravel/public/
Warning: require(/var/www/html/test/laravel/bootstrap/../vendor/autoload.php): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /var/www/html/test/laravel/bootstrap/autoload.php on line 17 Fatal error: require(): Failed opening required '/var/www/html/test/laravel/bootstrap/../vendor/autoload.php' (include_path='.:/php/includes:/var/www/html/php/includes:/jpa/release/jpa/includes:/usr/share/pear:/usr/share/php/phpmailer:/apache/htdocs/applications/surveys/Includes:/var/lib/ZF1/library') in /var/www/html/test/laravel/bootstrap/autoload.php on line 17I'm very new to Laravel and I am basically assuming that the reason for these errors is because i haven't installed all the various dependancies. And that you can only install all the dependancies through Composer. Is this the case? I downloaded the Laravel framework from GitHub Unfortunately.. My only real experience of PHP Frameworks is CodeIgniter. So I've never expoled/used "packages" or "dependancies" and don't really know where they are, or where they go, or what they do! I managed to get Laravel up and running on my personal computer (using Composer).... But, as I've said, I might not be able to do this on my day job server. Any tips? ----- Update ----- Is there a chance I am just misunderstanding the word "Dependancies"? It's not a word I often use. Does it just mean "The PHP files that make up the Laravel Framework"? Edited by Korferer, 19 November 2014 - 08:11 AM. Quick question about the dependency manager Composer with PHP. I have it installed and am pulling in a few libraries, it works pretty well as far as I can tell. I have a question that might be dumb, so I apologize in advance. When connecting to your application it's still required to use the lines similar to the following? <script src="vendor/components/jquery/jquery.min.js"></script> <link rel="stylesheet" href="vendor/twbs/bootstrap/dist/css/bootstrap.css" > Also I'm trying to figure out how to install the x3dom library, but cannot get composer to do it. (https://www.x3dom.org/) I want to install this package:
https://github.com/composer/installers
from GitHub, I can easily git clone it but I think its better I get experienced with composer. In the readme they onyl give one example, one involving CakePHP:
{ "name": "you/ftp", "type": "cakephp-plugin", "require": { "composer/installers": "~1.0" } }but I that isn't much help to me since I'm not making composer.json files to hold a single framework or plugin, my json files look more like this: { "name": "example-app", "require": { "cakephp/cakephp": ">=2.5.1", "cakephp/debug_kit": "2.2.*", "slywalker/boost_cake": "*", "CakeDC/tags": "1.*", "CakeDC/utils": "*", "CakeDC/migrations": "*", "FriendsOfCake/crud": "*", "CakeDC/search": "*", "paulredmond/chosen-cakephp": "*" }, "config": { "vendor-dir": "Vendor/" }, "extra": { "installer-paths": { "app/Plugin/Tags": ["CakeDC/tags"], "app/Plugin/BoostCake": ["slywalker/boost_cake"] } } }Right now I'm working on a WordPress one and it is 10 times longer than that. So what I was wondering is if its better to split it up into a few composer.json files. As in one file for setting up the framework and configuring it, when its done, it calls a second composer.json file that will take care of installing the plugins. Like this I suppose I could store a bunch of composer.json files in a central location, each of them has a specific purpose, so if I need to use one of them for a project, I just call composer.phar file (which I can access globally), and use that global keywork to make the json file operate like its in my projects directory. I don't understand what this autoload thing is about at all, but its nice the way it lets you run scripts at particular times during the execution of the json file. Is this actually a better way to work with composer, by chaining separate composer.json files together? A big issue is the name conflict thing, is there a way to make composer.phar process files with different names? It be a pain in the ass having to make the scripts alter the filenames. That gets me thinking about something. Can we define variables in composer.json files? If not, I suppose its not very hard to do it anyway by editing the file. I was thinking there that a composer file generator would be pretty useful. Like say on CakePHPs website, theres a page that lets you check plugins and features that you want for your new installation, then it makes a composer.json file for you. According to I would like to try to use JWT for my PHP and these are my step
on domain/app/
so I have
and on the login.php try{ echo "1"; require_once('vendor/autoload.php'); use firebase\JWT\JWT; echo "2"; } catch (Exception $e) { echo 'Caught exception: ', $e->getMessage(), "\n"; }
It's not show any thing and error "HTTP ERROR 500" I've got my own proprietary framework. I call it Brain. It uses composer, and installation is done with a single composer file, which is handy. Here's an example:
{ "name": "skunkbad/brain-test", "description": "My Awesome App", "license": "proprietary", "minimum-stability": "dev", "repositories": [ { "type": "hg", "url": "ssh://hg@bitbucket.org/skunkbad/brain" } ], "require": { "skunkbad/brain": "default" }, "scripts": { "post-install-cmd": "Brain\\Statics\\BrainInstallScript::run" } }Brain has it's own dependencies, which aren't all really dependencies, but I've added them all to its composer.json file so I get everything I want for a new project. Here is it's composer.json: { "name": "skunkbad/brain", "version": "1.0.0", "type": "framework", "license": "Proprietary", "authors": [ { "name": "Robert B Gottier", "email": "xXxXxXxXx@gmail.com", "homepage": "http://brianswebdesign.com", "role": "Developer" } ], "require": { "pimple/pimple" : "v2.0.0", "swiftmailer/swiftmailer": "v5.2.0", "dompdf/dompdf" : "0.6.1", "phpseclib/phpseclib" : "0.3.6", "stripe/stripe-php" : "v1.15.0", "firephp/firephp-core" : "dev-master", "doctrine/dbal" : "v2.4.2" }, "autoload": { "psr-4": { "Brain\\": "/", "App\\": "../../../App/" }, "classmap": [ "Statics/" ] } }In Windows terminal, I can run composer install or composer install --prefer-dist, and it seems that especially when the doctrine packages are being downloaded or cloned (whatever it does), its super slow. Some of them hang for so long that occasionally the terminal will give me a message indicating a particular package timed out (5 mins). So I was wondering if this is just the norm. Feels like I'm on dial-up, but my internet connection is Verizon FiOS (fiber optic). Here is an example of the time-out message I get from Composer: Failed to download doctrine/common from source: The process "git clone --no-checkout "git://github.com/doctrine/common.git" "C:\XXXxxx" && cd /D "C:\XXXxxx" && git remote add composer "git://github.com/doctrine/common.git" && git fetch composer" exceeded the timeout of 300 seconds. I timed my install, and composer/common actually hung for about 7 mins. Total time was 9.5 mins. Good morning, people! I'm having the following problem in my projectx in php: I created a project with Composer in php where I put php to listen to the public folder from the command prompt. However, when I upload the project to the site or to the xampp htdocs, the result of displaying the index (domain / projectx / public) is white. It does not display anything or any warning. Running with the php server via prompt listening directly to the public folder the project runs normally. The structure of the project is this (it has an attached image too): projeto x -App -Controller (folder with controllers) -Model (folder with models) -View (folder with views) -Connection (DB connection class) -Route (Class that manages the routes accessed in the browser and instantiates the necessary controllers) -public -.htaccess -index.php (Application start page that instantiates the Route class to determine the flow of the application) -vendor -composer (folder with composer files) -autoload.php composer.json composer.lock composer.phar When I include files in the public folder and access directly, the file works normally. That is, the server is listening to all folders.
Could you help me with this? If I have to configure something on the server or in my project? I am new to PHP and would greatly appreciate your help. Right now, I'm grateful! Application running on the latest version of Composer. Tested on php version 5.6.40 and 7.1
|